FAITH THE SOLE SAVING ACT.
John Tu 28, 29.—" Thon said they unto him, What shall we do, that we might work the works of God? Jesus answered and said unto them, This is the work of God, that ye believe ou him whom he hath sent."
In asking their question, the Jews intended to inquire of Christ what particular things they must do, before all others, in order to please God. The "works of God," as they denominate them, were not any and every duty, but those more special and important acts, by which the creature might secure the Divine approval and favor. Our Lord understood their question in this sense, and in His reply tells them, that the great and only work for them to do was to exercise faith in Him. They had employed the plural number in their question; but in His answer He employs the singular. They had asked, " What shall we do that we might work the works of God,—as if there were several of them. His reply is, "This is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent." He narrows down the terms of salvation to a single one; and makes the destiny of the soul to depend upon the
performance of a particular individual act. In this, as in many other incidental ways, our Lord teaches His own divinity. If He were a mere creature; if He were only an inspired teacher like David or Paul; how would He dare, when asked to give in a single word the condition and means of human salvation, to say that they consist in resting the soul upon Him? Would David have dared to say: "This is the work of God,—this is the saving act, —that ye believe in me?" Would Paul have presumed to say to the anxious inquirer: "Your soul is safe, if you trust in me?" But Christ makes this declaration, without any qualification. Yet He was meek and lowly of heart, and never assumed an honor or a prerogative that did not belong to Him. It is only upon the supposition that He was " very God of very God," the Divine Redeemer of the children of men, that we can justify such an auswer to such a question.
The belief is spontaneous and natural to man, that something must be done in order to salvation. No man expects to reach heaven by inaction. Even the indifferent and supine soul expects to rouse itself up at some future time, and work out its salvation. The most thoughtless and inactive man, in religious respects, will acknowledge that thoughtlessness and inactivity if continued will end in perdition. But he intends at a future day to think, and act, and be saved. So natural is it, to every man, to believe in salvation by works; so ready is every one to concede that heaven is reached, and hell is escaped, only by an earnest effort of some kind; so natural is it to every man to ask with these Jews, ""What shall we do, that we ma)7 work the works of God?"
But mankind generally, like the Jews in the days of our Lord, are under a delusion respecting the nature of the work which must be performed in order to salvation. And in order to understand this delusion, we must first examine the common notion upon the subject.
When a man begins to think of God, and of his own relations to Him, he finds that he owes Him service and obedience. He has a work to perform, as a subject of the Divine government; and this work is to obey the Divine law. He finds himself obligated to love God with all his heart, and his neighbor as himself, and to discharge all the duties that spring out of his relations to God and man. He perceives that this is the "work" given him to do by creation, and that if he does it he will attain the true end of his existence, and be happy in time and eternity. When therefore he begins to think of a religious life, his first spontaneous impulse is to begin the performance of this work which he has hitherto neglected, and to reinstate himself in the Divine favor by the ordinary method of keeping the law of God. He perceives that this is the mode in which the angels preserve themselves holy and happy; that this is the original mode appointed by God, when He established the covenant of works; and he does not see why it is not the method for him. The law expressly affirms that the man that doeth these things shall live by them; he proposes to take the law just as it reads, and just as it stands, —to do the deeds of the law, to perform the works which it enjoins, and to live by the service. This we say, is the common notion, natural to man, of the species of work which must be performed in order to eternal life. This was the idea which filled the mind of the Jews when they put the question of the text, and received for answer from Christ, "This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom he hath sent." Our Lord does not draw out the whole truth, in detail. He gives only the positive part of the answer,' leaving His hearers to infer the negative part of it. For the whole doctrine of Christ, fully stated, would run thus: "No work of the kind of which you are thinking can save you; no obedience of the law, ceremonial or moral, can reinstate you in right relations to God. I do not summon you to the performance of any such service as that which you have in mind, in order to your justification and acceptance before the Divine tribunal. This is the work of God,—this is the sole and single act which you are to perform,—namely, that you believe on Him whom He hath sent as a propitiation for sin. I do not summon you to works of the law, but to faith in Me the Redeemer. Your first duty is not to attempt to acquire a righteousness in the old method, by doing something of yourselves, but to receive a righteousness in the new method, by trusting in what another has done for you."
I. What is the ground and reason of such an answer as this? Why is man invited to the method of faith in another, instead of the method of faith in himself? Why is not his first spontaneous thought the true one? Why should he not obtain eternal life by resolutely proceeding to do his duty, and keeping the law of God? Why can he not be saved by the law of works? Why is he so summarily shut up to_the law of faith?
We answer: Because it is too late for him to adopt the method of salvation by works. The law is indeed explicit in its assertion, that the man that doeth these things shall live by them; bu* then it supposes that the man begin at the beginning. A subject of government cannot disobey a civil statute for five or ten years, and then put himself in right relations to it again, by obeying it for the remainder of_his life. Can a man who has been a thief or an adulterer for twenty years, and then practises honesty and purity for the following thirty years, stand up before the seventh and eighth commandments and be acquitted by them? It is too late for any being who has violated a law even in a single instance, to attempt to be justified by that law. For, the law demands and supposes that obedience begin at the very beginning of existence, and continue down uninterruptedly to the end of it. No man can come in at the middle of a process of obedience, any more than he can come in at the last end of it, if he proposes to be accepted upon the ground of obedience. "I testify,'' says St. Paul, " to every man that is circumcised, that he is a debtor to do the whole law" (Gal. v. 3). The whole, or none, is the just and inexorable rule which law lays down in the matter of justification. If any subject of the Divine government can show a clean record, from the beginning to the end of his existence, the statute says to him, "Well done," and gives him the reward which he has earned. And it gives it to him not as a matter of grace, but of debt. The law never makes a present of wages. It never pays out wages, until they are earned,—fairly and fully earned. • But when a perfect obedience from first to last is rendered to its claims, the compensation follows as matter of debt. The law, in this instance, is itself brought under obligation. It owes a reward to the perfectly obedient subject of law, and it considers itself his debtor until it is paid. "Now to him that worketh, is the reward not reckoned of grace, but of debt. If it be of works, then it is no more grace: otherwise work is no more work" (Rom. iv. 4; xi. 6).
But, on the other hand, law is equally exact and inflexible, in case the work has not been performed. It will not give eternal life to a soul that has sinned ten years, and then perfectly obeyed ten years, —supposing that there is any such soul. The obedience, as we have remarked, must run parallel with the entire existence, iu order to be a ground of justification. Infancy, childhood, youth, manhood, old age, and then the whole immortality that succeeds, must -all be uuintermittently sinless and holy, in order to make eternal life a matter of debt. Justice is as exact and punctilious upon this side, as it is upon the other. We have seen, that when a perfect obedience has been rendered, justice will not palm off the wages that are due as if they were some gracious gift; and on the other hand, when a perfect obedience has not been rendered, it will not be cajoled into the bestowment of wages as if they had been earned. There is no principle that is so intelligent, so upright, and so exact, as justice; and no creature can expect either to warp it, or to circumvent it.
In the light of these remarks, it is evident that it is toolate for a sinner to avail himself of the method of salvation by works. For, that method requires that sinless obedience begin at the beginning of his existence, and never be interrupted. But no man thus begins, and no man thus continues. "The wicked are estranged from the womb; they go astray as soon as they be born, speaking lies" (Ps. lviii. 3). Man comes into the world a sinful and alienated creature. He is by nature a child of wrath (Eph. ii. 3). Instead of beginning life with holiness, he begins it with sin. His heart at birth is apostate and corrupt; and his conduct from the very first is contrary to law. Such is the teaching of Scripture, such is the statement of the Creeds, and such is the testimony of consciousness, respecting the character which man brings into the world with him. The very dawn of human life is clouded with depravity; is marked by the carnal mind which is at enmity with the law of God, and is not subject to that law, neither indeed can be. How is it possible, then, for man to attain eternal life by a method that supposes, and requires, that the very dawn of his being be holy like that of Christ's, and that every thought, feeling, purpose, and act be conformed to law through the entire existence? Is it not too late for such a creature as man now is to adopt the method of salvation by the works of the law?
But we will not crowd you, with the doctrine of native depravity and the sin in Adam. We have no doubt that it is the scriptural and true doctrine concerning human nature; and have no fears that it will be contradicted by either a profound selfknowledge, or a profound metaphysics. But perhaps you are one who doubts it; and therefore, for the sake of argument, we will let you set the commencement of sin where you please. If you tell us that it begins in the second, or the fourth, or the tenth year of life, it still remains true that it is too late to employ the method of justification by works. If you concede any sin at all, at any point whatsoever, in the history of a human soul, you preclude it from salvation by the deeds of the law, and shut it up to salvation by grace. Go back as far as you can in your memory, and you must acknowledge that you find sin as far as you go; and even if, in the face of Scripture and the symbols of the Church, you should deny that the sin runs back to birth and apostasy in Adam, it still remains true that the first years of your conscious existence were not years of holiness, nor the first acts which you remember, acts of obedience. Even upon your own theory, you begin with sin, and therefore you cannot be justified by the law.
This, then, is a conclusive reason and ground for the declaration of our Lord, that the one great work which every fallen man has to perform, and must perform, in order to salvation, is faith in another's work, and confidence in another''8 righteousness. If man is to be saved by his own righteousness, that righteousness must begin at the very beginning of his existence, and go on without interruption. If he is to be saved by his own good works, there never must be a single instant in his life when he is not working such works. But beyond all controversy such is not the fact. It is, therefore, impossible for him to be justified by trusting in himself; and the only possible mode that now remains, is to trust in another.
II. And this brings us to the second part of our subject. "This is the work of God, that ye believe on him whom He bath sent." It will be observed that faith is here denominated a " work." And it is so indeed. It is a mental act; and an act of the most comprehensive and energetic species. Faith is an active principle that carries the whole man with it, and in it,—head and heart, will and affections, body soul and spirit. There is no act so allembracing in its reach, and so total in its momentum, as the act of faith in the Lord Jesus Christ. In this sense, it is a " work." It is no supine and torpid thing; but the most vital and vigorous activity that can be conceived of. When a sinner, moved by the Holy Ghost the very source of spiritual life and energy, casts himself in utter helplessness, and with all his weight, upon his Redeemer for salvation, never is he more active, and never does he do a greater work.
And yet, faith is not a work in the common signification of the word. In the Pauline Epistles, it is generally opposed to works, in such a way as to exclude them. For example: "Where is boasting then? It is excluded. By what law? of works? Nay, but by the law of faith. Therefore we conclude that a man is justified by faith, without the deeds of the law. Knowing that a man is not justified by the works of the law but by the faith of Jesus Christ, even we have believed in Jesus Christ, that we might be justified by the faith of Christ and not by the works of the law. Received ye the Spirit, by the works of the law, or by the hearing of faith ?"1 In these and other passages, faith and works are directly contrary to each other; so that in this connection, faith is not a ".work." Let us examine this point, a little in detail, for it will throw light upon the subjectunder discussion.
In the opening of the discourse, we alluded to the fact that when a man's attention is directed to the subject of his soul's salvation, his first spontaneous thought is, that he must of himself render something to God, as an offset for his sins; that he must perform his duty by his own power and effort, and thereby acquire a personal merit before his Maker and Judge. The thought of appropriating another person's work, of making use of what another being has done in his stead, does not occur to him; or if it does, it is repulsive to him. His thought is, that it is his own soul that is to be saved, and it is bis own work that must save it. Hence, he begins to perform religious duties in the ordinary use of his own faculties, and in his own strength, for the purpose, and with the expectation, of settling the account which he knows is unsettled between himself and his Judge. As yet, there is no faith in another Being. He is not trusting and resting in another person; but he is trusting and resting in himself. He is not making use of the work or services which another has wrought in his behalf, but heisemploy
1 Romans iii. 27, 28; Galatiana ii. 16, iii. 2.
ing his own powers and faculties, in performing these his own works, which he owes, and which, if paid in this style, he thinks will save his soul. This is the spontaneous, and it is the correct, idea of a " work,"—of what St. Paul so often calls a " work of the law." And it is the exact contrary of faith.
For, faith never does anything in this independent and self-reliant manner. It does not perform a service in its own strength, and then hold it out to God as something for Him to receive, and for which He must pay back wages in the form of remitting sin and bestowing happiness. Faith is wholly occupied with another's work, and another's merit. The believing soul deserts all its own doinars, and betakes itself to what a third person has wrought for it, and in its stead. When, for illustration, a sinner discovers that he owes a satisfaction to Eternal Justice for the sins that are past, if he adopts the method of works, he will offer up his endeavors to obey the law, as an offset, and a reason why he should be forgiven. He will say in his heart, if he does not in his prayer: "I am striving to atone for the past, by doing my duty in the future; my resolutions, my prayers and alms-giving, all this hard struggle to be better and to do better, ought certainly to avail for my pardon." Or, if he has been educated in a superstitious Church, he will offer up his penances, and mortifications, and pilgrimages, as a satisfaction to justice, and a reason why he should be forgiven and made blessed forever in heaven. That is a very instructive anecdote which St. Simon relates respecting the last hours of the ] profligate Louis XIV. "One day,"—he says,—" the / king recovering from loss of consciousness asked / his confessor, Pere Tellier, to give him absolution I for all his sins. Pere Tellier asked him if he suffered \ much. 'No,' replied the king, 'that's what troubles \ me. I should like to suffer more, for the expiation of my sins.'" Here was a poor mortal who had spent his days in carnality and transgression of the pure law of God. He is conscious of guilt, and feels the need of its atonement. And now, upon the very edge of eternity and brink of doom, he proposes to make his own atonement, to be his own redeemer and save his own soul, by offering up to the eternal nemesis that was racking his conscience a few hours of finite suffering, instead of betaking himself to the infinite passion and agony of Calvary. This is a " work;" and, alas, a "dead work," as St. Paul so often denominates it. This is the method of justification by works. But when a man adopts the method of justification by faith, his course is exactly opposite to all this. Upon discovering that he owes a satisfaction to Eternal Justice for the sins that are past, instead of holding up his prayers, or alms-giving, or penances, or moral efforts, or any work of his own, he holds up the sacrificial work of Christ. In his prayer to God, he interposes the agony and death of the Great Substitute between
his guilty soul, and the arrows of justice.1 lie knows that the very best of his own works, that even the most perfect obedience that a creature could render, would be pierced through and through by the glittering shafts of violated law. And therefore he takes the " shield of faith." He places the oblation of the God-man,—not his own work and not his own suffering, but another's work and another's suffering,—between himself and the judicial vengeance of the Most High. And in so doing, he works no work of his own, and no dead work; but he works the " work of God;" he believes on Him whom God hath set forth to be a propitiation for his sins, and not for his only but for the sins of the whole world.
1 The religions teacher is often asked to define the act of faith, and explain the way and manner in which the soul is to exercise it. "How shall I believe?" is the question with which the anxious mind often replies to the gospel injunction to believe. Without pretending that it is a complete answer, or claiming that it is possible, in the strict meaning of the word, to explain so simple and so profound an act as faith, we think, nevertheless, that it vssists the inquiring mind to say, „hat whoever asks in prayer for any one of the benefits of Christ's redemption, in so far exercises faith in this redemption. Whoever, for example, lifts up the supplication, "O Lamb of God who takest away the sins of the world, grant me thy peace," in this prayer puts faith in the atonement. He trusts in the atonement, by pleading the atonement, —by mentioning it, in his supplication, as the reason why he may ne forgiven. In like manner, he who asks for the renewing and sanctifying influences of the Holy Ghost exercises failh in these inAiences. This is the mode in which he expresses his confidence m the power of God to accomplish a work in his heart that is beyond his own power. Whatever, therefore, bf the particular benefit in Christ's redemption that one would trust in, and thereby make personally his own, that ho may live by it and be blest by it,—be it the atoning blood, or be it the indwelling Spirit,—let liim
ash for that benefit. If he would trust in the thing, let him ask/or the thing.
Since writing the above, wo have met with a corroboration of this view, by a writer of the highest authority upon such points. "Faith is that inward sense and act, of which prayer is the expression; as is evident, because in the same manner as the freedom of grace, according to the gospel covenant, is often set forth by this, that he that believes, receives; so it also oftentimes is by this, that he that asks, or prays, or calls vpon God, receives. 'Ask and it shall be given you; seek and ye shall find; knock and it shall be opened unto yon. For every one that asketh, receiveth; and he that seeketh, findeth: and to him that knocketh, it shall be opened. And nil things whatsoever ye shall ask in prayer, believing, ye shall receive (Matt. vii. 7, 8; Mark xi. 24). If ye abide in me and my words abide in you, ye si mil ash wh it ye will, and it shall be done untc you'(John xv. 7). Prayer is often plainly spoken of as the expression of faith. As it very certainly is in Romans x. 11-14: 'For the Scripture saith, Whosoever bclieveth on him shall not be ashamed. For there is no difference between the Jew and the Greek': for the same Lord over all is rich unto all that call upon him; for whosoever shall call upon the name of the Lord shall be saved. How then shall they call on him in. whom they' have not believed.'' Christian pray
This then is the great doctrine which our Lord taught the* Jews, when they asked Him what particular thing or things they must do in order to eternal life. The apostle John, who recorded the answer of Christ in this instance, repeats the doctrine again in his first Epistle: u Whatsoever we ask, we receive of Him, because we keep His commandment, and do those things that are pleasing in His sight. And this is His commandment, that we should believe on the name of His Son Jesus Christ" (1 John iil 22, 23). The whole duty of sinful man is here summed up, and concentrated, in the duty to trust in another person than himself,
, er is called the prayer of faith well be nsed for prayer also; snch
[ (James v. 15). 'I will thnt men as coming to God or Christ, and
\ everywhere lift up holy hands, looking to Him. 'In whom we
Without wrath and doubling (1 have boldness and access with
iTim. ii. 8). Draw near in lull confidence, by the faith of him'
lasMurance of faith' (Hub. x. 22). Eph. iii. 12)." Edwards: Ob
iThe same expressions that are servatious concerning Faith, used, in Scripture, for faith, may
and in another work than his own. The apostle, like his Lord before him, employs the singular number: "This is His commandment,"—as if there were no other commandment upon record. And this corresponds with the answer which Paul and Silas gave to the despairing jailor: "Believe on the Lord Jesus Christ,"—do this one single thing,—" and thou shalt be saved." And all of these teachings
. accord with that solemn declaration of our Lord: "He that believeth on the Son hath everlasting life; and he that believeth not the Son shall not see life; but the wrath of God abideth on, him." In the matter of salvation, where there is faith in Christ, there is everything; and where there is not faith in Christ, there is nothing.
1. And it is with this thought that we would close this discourse, and enforce the doctrine of the text. Do whatever else you may in the matter of religion, you have done nothing until you have believed on the Lord Jesus Christ, whom God hath sent into the world to be the propitiation for sin. There are two reasons for this. In the first place, it is the appointment and declaration of God, that man, if saved at all, must be saved by faith in the Person and Work of the Mediator. "Neither is there salvation in any other: for there is none other name under heaven given among men, whereby we must be saved" (Actsiv. 12). It of course rests entirely with the Most High God, to determine the mode and manner in which He will enter into negotiations with His creatures, and especially with His rebellious creatures. He must make the terms, and the creature must come to them. Even, therefore, if we could not see the reasonableness and adaptation of the method, we should be obligated to accept it. The creature, and particularly the guilty creature, cannot dictate to his Sovereign and Judge respecting the terms and conditions by which he is to be received into favor, and secure eternal life. Men overlook this fact, when tliey presume as they do, to sit in judgment upon the method of redemption by the blood of atonement and to quarrel with it.
In the first Punic war, Hannibal laid siege to Saguntum, a rich and strongly-fortified city on the eastern coast of Spain. It was defended with a desperate obstinacy by its inhabitants. But the discipline, the energy, and the persistence of the Carthagiuian army, were too much for them; and just as the city was about to fall, Alorcus, a Spanish chieftain, and a mutual friend of both of the contending parties, undertook to mediate between them. He proposed to the Saguntiues that they should surrender, allowing the Carthaginian general to make his own terms. And the argument he used was this: "Your city is captured, in any event. Further resistance will only bring down upon you the rage of an incensed soldiery, and the horrors of a sack. Therefore, surrender immediately, and take w hatever Hannibal shall please to give. You cannot lose anything by the procedure, and you may gain something, even though it be little."1 Now, although there is no resemblance between the government of the good and merciful God and the cruel purposes and conduct of a heathen warrior, and we shrink from bringing the two into any kind of juxtaposition, still, the advice of the wise Alorcus to the Saguutines is good advice for every sinful man, in reference to his relations to Eternal Justice. We are all of us at the mercy of God. Should He make no terms at all; had He never given His Son to die for our sins, and never sent His Spirit to exert a subduing influence upon our hard hearts, but had let guilt and justice take their inexorable course with us; not a word could be uttered against the procedure by heaven, earth, or hell. No creature, anywhere can complain of justice. That is an attribute that cannot even be attacked. But the All-Holy is also the All-Merciful. He has made certain terms, and has offered certain conditions of pardon, without asking leave of His creatures and without taking them into council, and were these terms as strict as Draco, instead of being as tender and pitiful as the tears and blood of Jesus, it would become us criminals to make no criticisms even in that extreme case, but accept them precisely as they were offered by the Sovereign and the Arbiter. We exhort you, therefore, to take these terms
1 Livius: Ilistoria, Lib. xxi. 18.
of salvation simply as they are given, asking no questions, and being thankful that there are any terms at all between the offended majesty of Heaven and the guilty criminals of earth. Believe on Him whom God hath sent, because it is the appointment and declaration of God, that if guilty man is to be saved at all, he must be saved by faith in the Person and Work of the Mediator. The very disposition to quarrel with this method implies arrogance in dealing with the Most High. The least inclination to alter the conditions shows that the creature is attempting to criticise the Creator, and, what is yet more, that the criminal has no true perception of his crime, no sense of his exposed and helpless situation, and presumes to dictate the terms of his own pardon!
2. We might therefore leave the matter here, and there would be a sufficient reason for exercising the act of faith in Christ. But there is a second and additional reason which we will also briefly urge upon you. Not only is it the Divine appointment, that man shall be saved, if saved at all, by the substituted work of another; but there are needs, there are crying wants, in the human conscience, that can be supplied by no other method. There is a perfect adaptation between the Redemption that is in Christ Jesus, and the guilt of sinners. As we have seen, we could reasonably urge you to believe in Him whom God hath sent, simply because God has sent Him, and because He has told you that He will save you through no other name and in no other way, and will save you in this name and in this way. But we now urge you to the act of faith in this substituted work of Christ, because it has an atoning virtue, and can pacify a perturbed and angry conscience; can wash out the stains of guilt that are grained into it; can extract the sting of sin which ulcerates and burns there. It is the idea of expiation and satisfaction that we now single out, and press upon your notice. Sin must be expiated,—expiated either by the blood of the criminal, or by the blood of his Substitute. You must either die for your own sin, or some one who is able and willing must die for you. This is founded and fixed in the nature of God, and the nature of man, and the nature of sin. There is an eternal and necessary connection between crime and penalty. The wages of sin is death. But, all this inexorable necessity has been completely provided for, by the sacrificial work of the Son of God. In the gospel, God satisfies His own justice for the sinner, and now offers you the full benefit of the satisfaction, if you will humbly and penitently accept it. "What compassion can equal the words of God the Father addressed to the sinner condemned to eternal punishment, and having no means of redeeming himself: 'Take my Only-Begotten Son, and make Him an offering for thyself;' or the words of the Son: 'Take Me, and ransom thy soul?' For this is what both say, when they invite and draw man to faith in the gospel."1 In urging you, therefore, to trust in Christ's vicarious sufferings for sin, instead of going down to hell and suffering for sin in your own person; in entreating you to escape the stroke of justice upon yourself, by believing in Him who was smitten in your stead, who "was wounded for your transgressions and bruised for your iniquities;" in beseeching you to let the Eternal Son of God be your Substitute in this awful judicial transaction; we are summoning you to no arbitrary and irrational act. The peace of God which it will introduce into your conscience, and the love of God which it will shed abroad through your soul, will be the most convincing of all proofs that the act of faith in the great Atonement does no violence to the ideas and principles of the human constitution. No act that contravenes those intuitious and convictions which are part and particle of man's moral nature could possibly produce peace and joy. It would be revolutionary and anarchical. The soid could not rest au instant. And yet it is the uniform testimony of all believers in the Lord Jesus Christ, that the act of simple confiding faith in His blood and righteousness is the mast peaceful, the most joyful act they ever performed,—nay, that it was the first blessed experience they ever felt in this world of sin, this world of remorse, this world of
1 Ansri.m: Onr Dous [Initio? II. 20.
fears and forebodings concerning judgment and doom.
Is the question, then, of the Jews, pressing upon your mind? Do you ask, What one particular single thing shall I do, that I may be safe for time and eternity? Hear the answer of the Son of God Himself: "This is the work of God, that ye believe on Him whom He hath sent."
CHEDD.—A History Of Christian Doctrine. By ^ William G. T. Shedd, D.D., Professor of Iiiblical Literature in Union Theological Seminary, New York. Two volumes, 8vo. A new edition on tinted paper. Cloth $5 oo
This is a most elaborate and thoughtful work, by a philosophical Christian scholar. Although the first attempt of the kind in English literature, to write an account of the gradual construction of all the doctrines of the Christian religion, the author has produced a remarkable work. It is divided into seven books: I. Influence of Philosophical Systems; 2. History of Apologies; 3. History of Theology (Trinitarianism and Christology); 4. History of Anthropology; 5. of Soteriology; 6. of Eschatology; 7. of Symbols. It is a clear and able history, and will reward attentive study. The style is lucid and penetrating; the discussions move onward according to the law of the subjects themselves, as evoked in history; and new light is thrown on past thought by pertinent illustration from subsequent times. No one can master these volumes without being strengthened and quickened. The History of Christian Doctrine thus conceived and composed, is one of the strongest of all defences of the Christian faith.
"Dr. Shedd has furnished an important contribution to the study of church history. To have made a readable book—a book which must interest the general scholar as well as the professed theologian—on a topic so difficult and so remote from the ordinary interests and literary currents of the time, is itself a rare and very great merit, demanding graceful recognition from all the scholars of the land. And Dr. Shedd's is eminently a readable book, and will, no doubt, be extensively read beyond the circle of his own profession, by intelligent laymen in all the walks of life."—North American Review.
"It is many years since a more valuable contribution has been made, in this country or England, to theological literature; one the study of which will yield riper fruits of Christian knowledge. These volumes are marked by a thoroughness of knowledge and clearness of statement, as well as by a certain vital element which pervades them, and which shows the love of the author for his great theme, and that he takes his position, not without but within his subject, and so relates the transformations and developments of religious thought as if he had himself passed through them.*'—Bibliotheca Sacra.
"We hold that this is the most important contribution that has been made to our theological literature during the present age."—Presbyterian Standard.
"We know of no treatise issued in English during the last quarter century, that can be of ■0 much real worth to the student in divinity."—Boston Review.
"In our judgment, no production of greater moment has been given to the public for a long time."—Princeton Review.
"A body of theological history which is in form as perfect as it is in substance excellent"— U. Y. Evening Post.
"It well deserves an honorable and permanent place in the standard literature of theology.' —AVw Euglander.
** A rich addition to cur theological literature."—American Theological Review.
CHEDD.—A Treatise On Homiletics And Pastor^ Al Theologv. By William G. T. Shedd, D.D., author of the "History of Christian Doctrine." One volume, 8vo, tinted paper, cloth $2 50
This work consists of a series of lectures on the main points of Homiletics and Pastoral Theology. The author handles the subject in a fresh and masterly manner, and many of his thoughts are original, and highly suggestive. The Homiletical part is especially valuable to ministers, and those in training fur the ministry. Dr. Shcdd's style is a model of purity, simplicity, and strength. For this and other reasons, the volume possesses value tor the legal profession, and for all who enjoy the higher forms of literature.
"The work will be found to be an admirable guide and stimulus in whatever pertains to this department of theology. The student finds himself in the hands of a master able to' quicken and enlarge his scope and spirit. The homiletical precepts arc well illustrated by Ihe author's own style, which is muscular, while quivering with nervous life. Nowadays one rarely reads such good English writing, elevated and clear, sinewy and flexible, transparent for the thought Each topic is handled in a true progressive method. Our young minister! may well make a study of this book."—American Theol. Review.
"We have read, and with the profoundest interest, the whole of this remarkable bcr\ We do not see how a minister can read it without finding himself perpetually incited to higher intellectual and spiritual attainments, and perpetually impelled to intenser practical earnestness in preaching the Gospel. . . . To our view it is the ablest and the best of all which Dr. Shedd has written. It is equally remarkable for the range of its erudition, and for the keenness and thoroughness of its analysis—for its tendency to stimulate the intellect, and to enlarge and intensify the moral purposes."—N. V. Examiner.
"We have read this book with almost unqualified approval. We cannot but regard it as, on the whole, the very best production of the kind with which we are acquainted. The topics discussed are of the first importance to every minister of Christ engaged in active service, and their discussion is conducted by earnestness as well as ability, and in a style which for clear, vigorous, and unexceptionable English, is itself a model. We doubt whether more good could be accomplished with the same means in any other way than by placing a copy of the work in die hands of every clergyman in the land."—-V. Y. Evangelist.
MDr. Shedd writes in a masculine and nervous style, filled with thought His popular qualities are more distinctly seen in this volume than in his previous able works, which have gained him so high a place among our theologians. The subjects are such as in their own nature would command the interest of students and preachers of the word ; and, as here treated, they arrest and hold the mind, informing it with vital truth."—Round Table.
"The work is in every respect one of the ablest ever written upon the range of subjects which it embraces; and all public speakers, to whatever profession they may belong, will find it a profitable one to study."—Hours at Home.
"The ablest book on the subject which the generation has produced,"—Christian InttUigr-ter.
A Commentary on tie Holy Scriptures, Critical, Doctrinal, and Homiletical.
By JOHN P. LA NGE, D.D., in connection with a number of eminent European 2W vines. Translated from the German, and edited, with.ndditions, original and selected, by Philip Schajf, D.D., in connection with American Dh'ines of various evangelical denominations.
Price per Volume, Cloth, SS.OO; Sheep, $6.SO.
TKN VOLUMES NOW PUBLISHED).
GENESIS.— Translated and edited by yler Lewis, l.L.l)., and A. Gosmau,
A NEW VOLUME JUST READY.
Comprising GALATIANS, EPHESIANS, PHILIPPIANS, AND COLOS. SIANS. Translated and Edited by Rev. C. C. Starbuck, M. B. Riddle, D.D., and Prof. H. B. Hackett, D.D.
The nine, volume* of l*auye'l Commentary previously published, arc.
THE EPISTLE OF PAUL TO THE
ROMANS.— By J. P. Lange, D.D.,
and K. R. Kay. Translated by J. K.
Hurst, D.n.,Wlth additions by P. Schaff,
D.D., and Rev. M. li. Riddle.
CORINTHIANS.-Translated and edited by Drs. D. W. Poor and Conway Wing.
THESSALONIANS, TIMOTHY, TITUS, PHILEMON, AND HEBREWS. Translated and edited by Drs. Harwood and Washburne, Professors Kendrick, Hackett, and Day, and the late Dr. John Lillie.
THE EPISTLES GENERAL OF
JAMES, PETER, JOHN, AND
JUDE.—Translated and edited by J
PROVERBS.—Translated and edited by President t harlrs A. Aiken, of Union t ollege. ECCLESIASTES.—Translated by Prof. William Wells, and edited by Tayler Lewis, L1..D-, of Union College. SONG OF SOLOMON.— Translated and edited by W. II. Green, D.D., of Princeton.
MATTHEW.—Translated and edited by
Philip Schaff, D.D.
MARK AND LUKE.-Translated and
edited by Prof. W. G. T. Shedd, D.D.,
Philip Schaff, D.D., and Rev. C C
ACTS.—Translated and edited by Chas.
V. Schaflcr, D.D.
. - Baptist
IAYI.ER LEWIS. LL.D., - Dutch Reformed
Kev. CHARLES F. SCHAFFER. Lutheran
R. I). HITCHCOCK, D.D., - - Presbyterian
15. HARWOOD, D.I).. Episcopal
II. B. HACKETT. D.D., Baptist
IOH.N LILLIE. D.D., ... - Presbyterian
- Presbyterian Congregational
, - - Episcopal "Presliytenai,
- Presbyterian Congregational . . Episcopal
- Presbyterian Dutch Reti.nnc,I
Prof. WILLIAM WELLS.- - - - Methc H7T Each volume of " LANGE'S COMMENTARY" is complete in itself, and can be purchased separately. Sent post-paid to any address upon receipt of the price ($5 per volume) by the Publishers.
CHARLES SCRIBNER & CO., 654 Broadway, N. Y
FROUDE'3 HISTORY OF ENGLAND. Popular edition. In
twelve volumes umo. Per vol ... $300 $1 25
The set in a neat case 36 00 15 00
FROUDE'S SHORT STUDIES ON GREAT SUBJECTS. One
volume t2ino 3 00 15a
MOMMSEN'S HISTORY OF ROME. In four volumej crown 8vo.
Per vol 2 50 2 00
The set in a neat case 10 00 8 00
DEAN STANLEY i JEWISH CHURCH. Part I. Maps and
Plans. One volume crown 8vo 400 250
Part II. One volume crowr 8vo - 1 5 00 2 50
DEAN STANLEY'S EASTERN CHURCH. On« Toi. crown 8vo. 400 250
ARCHBISHOP TRENCH'S STUDIES IN THE GOSPELS.
One volume large 1211m, cioth 300 250
LORD DERBY'S TRANSLATION OF HOMER'S ILIAD.
Containing all the author's latest revisions and corrections, Two
volumes in one 5 00 2 50
FORSYTH'S LIFE OF CICERO. Two volumes in one J 00 250
CONYBEARE & HOWSON'S LIFE AND EPISTLES OF ST. PAUL. Complete and unabridged edition. The two volume* or the l.ninlnii edilion in one, with the 1'exl and Notes entire, and the Maps and Illustrations 7 50 3 00
DR J. ADDISON ALEXANDER'S SERMONS. Two volumes
in one, crown 8vo 4 Co 25°
DR. J. W. ALEXANDER'S FAMILIAR LETTERS. Two
volumes in one, crown 8vo 4 00 2 50
DR. SCHAFF'S CHRISTIAN CHURCH. Three volumes in two.. 11 25 7 50
DR. SHEDD'S HISTORY OF CHRISTIAN DOCTRINE. Two
volumes 8vo 7 50 5 00
DR. SHEDD'S HOMILETICS. One volume 8vo 3 50 2 so
MAINE'S ANCIENT LAW. One volume crown 8vo 3 00 2 50
BRACE'S RACES OF THE OLD WORLD. One vol cr. 8vo... 250 2 00
DR. JNO. LORD'S ANCIENT HISTORY. One volume tamo... 300 15°
Tkete wo*ks to be And 0/ all Bivksellers, or sent, post-paid, upon receipt 0/ the price, by the publisher!,
CHARLES SCRIBNER & CO.,
ffSi Sroacltrety, Weir York.