Levítico 22:22

22 O cego, ou quebrado, ou aleijado, ou que tiver úlceras, ou sarna, ou impigens, estes não oferecereis ao Senhor, nem deles poreis oferta queimada ao Senhor sobre o altar.

Levítico 22:22 Meaning and Commentary

Leviticus 22:22

Blind, or broken, or maimed
Which is "blind" of one eye, or both: and so the Egyptians, as they would not sacrifice any of their oxen that had any blemishes on them, and were of a different colour, or changed in their form, so likewise such that were deprived of either of their eyes F24. Some, as Aben Ezra observes, restrain that which is "broken" to its being broken in the head; but others interpret it of any fracture of the foot, as well as the head, and even of the tail, side, or rib; though others think, that such fractures as were not open and visible are excepted, as that of the rib; so Gersom; and with the Heathens, as Pliny F25 would have remarked, as they were not used to sacrifice calves, brought on men's shoulders, so neither anything that halted: that which is maimed some understand of that whose foot is broken, as Aben Ezra also remarks; but the word is by the Septuagint rendered, "cut in the tongue"; and the Targum of Jonathan, "whose eyebrows are smitten"; and Jarchi seems to take in both, interpreting it the eyebrow which is cut or broken, and so the lip, which is cut or broken: but it is rather to be understood more generally of its being maimed or mutilated in any part of it; so with the Heathens, as Porphyry F26 affirms, beasts that were mutilated were not to be sacrificed; and in the Comedian F1, a sacrifice is objected to, because it had no tail; upon which the Scholiast observes, that whatever was mutilated was not offered in sacred services, nor was any thing imperfect or unsound sacrificed to the gods; and particularly Servius F2 remarks, if their tongues were cut or slit; which illustrates the Septuagint version, which is observed by Grotius: or having a wen:
or full of warts, as others; the Targum of Jonathan is, whose eyes are smitten with a mixture of white and black; and so Gersom interprets it of a like defect in the eye, in the white of the eye; for he says, if it was in the black or pupil of the eye, the eye would be blind: or scurvy or scabbed:
the same of those in men; (See Gill on Leviticus 21:20): ye shall not offer these unto the Lord;
any creatures defective in any of these instances; three times this is said, as Jarchi observes, to make them careful concerning the sanctification of them, and concerning the slaying of them, and concerning the sprinkling of their blood: nor make an offering by fire of them upon the altar unto the Lord;
a burnt offering on the altar of burnt offering, or burn the fat of them upon it.


FOOTNOTES:

F24 Chaeremon. apud Porphyr. de Abstinentia, l. 4. sect. 7.
F25 Nat. Hist. l. 8. c. 45.
F26 De Abstinentia, l. 2. sect. 23.
F1 Aristoph. Acharnens. ver. 784.
F2 In Virgil. Aeneid. l. 6.

Levítico 22:22 In-Context

20 Nenhuma coisa, porém, que tiver defeito oferecereis, porque não será aceita a vosso favor.
21 E, quando alguém oferecer sacrifício de oferta pacífica ao Senhor para cumprir um voto, ou para oferta voluntária, seja do gado vacum, seja do gado miúdo, o animal será perfeito, para que seja aceito; nenhum defeito haverá nele.
22 O cego, ou quebrado, ou aleijado, ou que tiver úlceras, ou sarna, ou impigens, estes não oferecereis ao Senhor, nem deles poreis oferta queimada ao Senhor sobre o altar.
23 Todavia, um novilho, ou um cordeiro, que tenha algum membro comprido ou curto demais, poderás oferecer por oferta voluntária, mas para cumprir voto não será aceito.
24 Não oferecereis ao Senhor um animal que tiver testículo machucado, ou moído, ou arrancado, ou lacerado; não fareis isso na vossa terra.
The Almeida Atualizada is in the public domain.