Esther 7 Study Notes
Share
This resource is exclusive for PLUS Members
Upgrade now and receive:
- Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy uninterrupted access.
- Exclusive Commentaries: Dive deeper with in-depth insights.
- Advanced Study Tools: Powerful search and comparison features.
- Premium Guides & Articles: Unlock for a more comprehensive study.
7:7 For the first time in the book of Esther the king had to make crucial decisions without his counselors. Suddenly he was forced to choose between his prime minister and his wife. But if he deposed Haman for threatening his wife and her people, would not Haman counter by revealing that the king himself had approved of the plan? While the king struggled with his decisions in the garden, Haman stayed back with Esther to beg (Hb lebaqqesh) for his life. Before, it was Esther (v. 3) who had sought (“desire,” Hb baqqashah) to be spared, but now the tables were turned.
7:8 If the king was still undecided about Haman’s fate as he returned from the garden, his decision was made certain as he caught Haman fawning over the queen. Court documents from the Assyrian period state that a man must not come closer than seven steps to one of the women in the palace (D. J. A. Clines). The Jewish Targums of Esther (Aramaic paraphrase of the Hb texts) state that Haman was falling on the couch because the angel Gabriel gave him a shove!
The author of the story skillfully used the concept of falling (Hb naphal). Haman was furious at Mordecai because he would not bow down to him (3:1-4). This resulted in the casting (Hb naphal) of the Pur to set the date for the extermination of the Jews (3:7). Then Haman’s wife and friends warned him that “since Mordecai is Jewish, and you have begun to fall (Hb naphal) before him, you won’t overcome him, because your downfall (Hb naphal) is certain” (6:13). Only hours later Haman was falling (Hb naphal) on Esther’s couch. With this final fall his fate was sealed.
7:9-10 The irony demonstrated in these verses is stated proverbially in Pr 26:27 and Mt 26:52.