Genesis 29 Study Notes
Share
This resource is exclusive for PLUS Members
Upgrade now and receive:
- Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy uninterrupted access.
- Exclusive Commentaries: Dive deeper with in-depth insights.
- Advanced Study Tools: Powerful search and comparison features.
- Premium Guides & Articles: Unlock for a more comprehensive study.
This arrangement is reminiscent of a provision in the law of Moses that permitted certain slaves to work seven years for their freedom (Ex 21:2). Men did not “buy” wives in the strict sense of the word; however, they did customarily pay a bride-price (Gn 34:12; Ex 22:17; 1Sm 18:25) to their future wife’s family to compensate them for the care and protection provided to the woman prior to her marriage.
29:21-24 Jacob, now almost fifty years old (25:24-26; 26:34-35; 27:46) after working for Laban seven years, informed Laban that it was time for him to sleep with Rachel. Arranging a week-long wedding feast, Laban proceeded to cheat the family member who had cheated other people in the past (27:12-25,36). Instead of the expected younger daughter Rachel, Laban gave Leah to Jacob. In the darkness of the evening and with his bride concealed behind a veil (24:65), Jacob did not realize what had been done to him. Accordingly, he slept with Leah.
29:25-30 As Kenneth Mathews says, “Jacob’s indignation is a fitting answer to the crime he perpetrated against Esau.” Marriage to two sisters would later be forbidden by Mosaic law (Lev 18:18).
29:31-35 The Lord, who had seen and provided for Hagar previously in her time of need (16:13-14), now saw that Leah was unloved (lit “hated”) and opened her womb. In a society where a woman’s prestige depended almost entirely on her success in bearing sons, the Lord gave Leah four sons before she temporarily (31:17) stopped having children. Three themes are present in Leah’s remarks: her conviction that God provided these children in response to her affliction and unloved condition, her hope that the births would cause her husband to love her, and her praise to the Lord for what he had done. The explanations connected with each son’s name are not linguistic etymologies, but explanations of wordplays.