John 7 Study Notes

PLUS

This resource is exclusive for PLUS Members

Upgrade now and receive:

  • Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy uninterrupted access.
  • Exclusive Commentaries: Dive deeper with in-depth insights.
  • Advanced Study Tools: Powerful search and comparison features.
  • Premium Guides & Articles: Unlock for a more comprehensive study.
Upgrade to Plus

7:30 On Jesus’s ability to elude his enemies, see note at 2:4.

7:31 Since Messiah would be a prophet like Moses (Dt 18:15,18) and Moses performed many miraculous signs at the exodus (Ex 7-11), Messiah was expected to perform miracles as well (see notes at Jn 6:30,31). It would have been natural for people to wonder, after witnessing Jesus’s miracles, if he was the Messiah.

7:32 The chief priests and the Pharisees, representing the Sanhedrin, deployed servants to arrest Jesus. His arrest implied that he was a criminal (but see note at vv. 45-52). The leaders hoped this would discourage people from following him.

7:33-34 Six months after Jesus issued this prediction, he was crucified.

7:35-36 People misunderstood Jesus’s statement in v. 34. Ever since the exile, many Jews had not returned to Palestine but continued to live dispersed among the Greeks (synonymous with “Gentiles”).

7:37 While v. 14 referred to the festival being “already half over,” this was now the last and greatest day of the Festival of Shelters. Jesus’s invitation harks back to OT prophetic passages such as Is 55:1 (cp. Is 12:3).

7:38-39 Streams of living water flowing from deep within Jesus’s followers fulfill the end-time blessings predicted in the OT. John noted in v. 39 that these streams are emblematic of the Spirit, who would be given after Jesus’s exaltation with the Father (20:22).

7:40-41 The Prophet is the figure referred to in Dt 18:15-18 (see note at Jn 1:19-21; cp. 6:14). This “Prophet” and the Messiah were thought to be different persons by some first-century Jews, but Jesus turned out to be both.

7:42 Bethlehem, south of Jerusalem in the heart of Judea, was foretold as Messiah’s birthplace in Mc 5:2 (cp. Mt 2:5-6; see note at Jn 7:27). As David’s city (1Sm 16:1,4; 20:6), Bethlehem had important messianic implications. In this verse the irony is apparent. Some people, knowing that Jesus hailed from Galilee, objected that Messiah was to be born in Bethlehem, not realizing that Bethlehem was in fact Jesus’s birthplace.

7:43-44 On the right time for Jesus’s death and resurrection, see note at 2:4.

7:45-52 The Sanhedrin’s meeting highlighted the increasing threat that Jesus’s popularity represented for the Jewish leadership. But Nicodemus’s plea for fairness shows that the Sanhedrin was not yet united in opposition against Jesus.

7:45 On the attempt to arrest Jesus, see note at v. 32.

7:46 The servants (see v. 32) heard many people teach in the temple courts, but they recognized Jesus’s teaching as unique (Mt 7:28-29; see note at Jn 7:14-15).

7:48 Rulers probably refers to members of the Sanhedrin (see note at 3:1).

7:49 The disparaging reference to this crowd, which doesn’t know the law reveals the arrogant contempt many rabbis had for the unschooled masses.

7:50 Jesus’s previous encounter with Nicodemus is described in 3:1-15.

7:51 Old Testament law charged judges to investigate accusations fairly (Dt 1:16) and thoroughly (Jn 17:4; 19:18). Nicodemus’s plea for fairness was later duplicated by the rabbi Gamaliel (Ac 5:34-39).

7:52 Contrary to the Pharisees’ implication, prophets occasionally did arise from Galilee. These included Jonah (2Kg 14:25), possibly Elijah (1Kg 17:1), and Nahum (Nah 1:1).

7:53-8:11 The story of Jesus and the adulteress may be authentic, but it is doubtful that the account is part of John’s original Gospel. Reasons include: (1) the account is absent from all the oldest copies of John; (2) where it does occur in later manuscripts, it is found at various places (after Jn 7:36,44,52; at the end of John’s Gospel; or after Lk 21:38); (3) virtually every verse from 8:1-11 (except for v. 5) features words not elsewhere found in John’s Gospel, and standard vocabulary used in John is conspicuously absent; (4) the account appears to interrupt the narrative flow from 7:52 to 8:12, breaking the literary unit 7:1-8:59; and (5) the account was virtually unknown by early church fathers before the fourth century.