Thomas suggests that John used a figure of speech known as a litotes. Interpreters . . . could take the blotting out as an example of litotes, a figure of speech in which an affirmative is expressed by the negative of a contrary statement. Coming by way of denial of the opposite, this is an understatement to express emphatically the assurance that the overcomers name will be retained in the book of life.1But understanding Christs warning in Revelation Rev. 3:5+ as a figure of speech doesnt seem to do justice to the context:
The promise to the overcomer is an empty one unless the possibility exists that such a blotting out could occur. What incentive is furnished by being promised deliverance from something that could not happen? Furthermore, the psalmist prays for the blotting out of the names from the book of life (Ps. Ps. 69:28), and in so doing indicates that such is a distinct possibility. The not blotting referred to in this verse [Rev. Rev. 3:5+] must be more than a figure of speech.2The difficulties attending this view are:
- Moses offer to be blotted out of Gods book (Ex. Ex. 32:32) appears to be parallel to that of Paul (Rom. Rom. 9:3). This view trivializes Moses offer to be blotted out with Gods people (only involving physical death) and fails to recognize the parallel of Pauls comment in Romans which concerns spiritual death, not physical.
- Understanding the warning of being blotted out in Revelation Rev. 3:5+ as a literary device doesnt do justice to the context of the letter to the church at Sardis.
- The terms book of the living (Ps. Ps. 69:28) and Book of Life (Rev. Rev. 20:12+, Rev. 20:15+) are so similar as to call into question any view which maintains they are different books.