Ezekiel 9 Footnotes

PLUS

This resource is exclusive for PLUS Members

Upgrade now and receive:

  • Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy uninterrupted access.
  • Exclusive Commentaries: Dive deeper with in-depth insights.
  • Advanced Study Tools: Powerful search and comparison features.
  • Premium Guides & Articles: Unlock for a more comprehensive study.
Upgrade to Plus

Second, it was permissible to take a life in the course of warfare. The command to kill those who were not grieved over Judah’s rebellion against the Lord is comparable to the command to exterminate the Canaanites during Israel’s occupation of the land (see note on Jos 6:17). A population steeped in pagan religion could not be allowed to remain, for it would tempt the people away from loyalty to the Lord.

Third, under the principle of corporate solidarity (see notes on Dt 2:34; 5:9; 19:6), all who participate in a sinful culture are tainted by its sin. The application of the protective “mark” was an act of mercy by which the Lord spared those faithful few who had not yielded to the general perversity of a society under judgment; the prophet interceded with the Lord on their behalf (Ezk 9:8). Finally, this passage was a vision given to Ezekiel in Babylon (see note on 8:1), not an act that was ever carried out. As extreme as the Lord’s command appeared, the actual killings in the streets of Jerusalem would be done by the Babylonian invaders, not the six warriors shown to Ezekiel. The slaughter in this passage was a word picture predicting the eventual doom of Jerusalem and its inhabitants because of the pervasive climate of sin; the whole nation was guilty of “bloodshed” and “perversity” (9:9-10).