Malachi Introduction
Share
This resource is exclusive for PLUS Members
Upgrade now and receive:
- Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy uninterrupted access.
- Exclusive Commentaries: Dive deeper with in-depth insights.
- Advanced Study Tools: Powerful search and comparison features.
- Premium Guides & Articles: Unlock for a more comprehensive study.
AUTHOR
The prophet Malachi’s name means “my messenger,” and some have wondered whether that was his real name or a title. For example, “my messenger” in 3:1 has the same Hebrew form as the name Malachi. Additionally, the phrases “the messenger of the LORD of Armies” (2:7) and “my messenger” (3:1) are related to Malachi’s name. The emphasis of the book is clearly on the message rather than the messenger, since 47 of the book’s 55 verses are personal addresses from the Lord. An ancient Jewish tradition identifies Malachi with Ezra, but this seems improbable. Since all the other writing prophets are named in the heading to their book, it seems best to take Malachi as the prophet’s name.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND OF MALACHI
Malachi could have written his book anytime between about 500–400 BC. The earlier date is the approximate time for the fall of Edom (Esau), which Malachi referred to as in the past (1:2-4). The later date is about the time that Nehemiah’s ministry ended and when the last part of the Old Testament was written. Certain issues that Malachi treated were also treated by Ezra and Nehemiah, leading to the conclusion that Malachi was likely written between 450–400 BC. These include the problems of mixed marriages (Ezr 9–10; Neh 10:30; 13:23-27; Mal 2:11), corrupt priests (Neh 13:4-9; Mal 1:6–2:9), and the failure of people to pay their tithes (Neh 13:10-13; Mal 3:5-10).
THE MEANING OF MALACHI’S MESSAGE
Malachi contrasted the faithfulness of the Lord with the faithlessness of Israel. The Lord had always loved Israel, still loved Israel, and would always love his people. In return, the Lord expected the honor due to a father from a child or the respect due to a master from a slave. The Israelites had failed to honor God, choosing instead to participate in disrespectful worship practices and to oppress their fellow Israelites. The Lord would deal with these issues by judging the guilty and blessing the repentant. He would purify his people, removing those who persisted in disobedience and leaving behind a righteous remnant.
While animal sacrifices and tithes are concerns more of the Old Testament than of the New Testament, the principle of bringing the best to the Lord still abides. Honor and respect are still due the Lord, and he still desires that those who worship him do so by dedicating themselves entirely to him. The tithe was a way to carry out in an economic way the wholehearted love of God and the love of neighbor as oneself (Lv 19:18; Dt 6:4-9). Believers today would do well to consider all they have as a stewardship responsibility from the Lord, asking him what he would have them do with what he has given.
The Bible plainly teaches that only those who personally, consciously, and explicitly confess Jesus Christ as Lord possess eternal life. All others will face the holy and just wrath of God in hell throughout eternity.
Throughout the New Testament, the biblical writers uniformly describe a coming fixed and final divine judgment. Revelation 20:11-15 describes this scene in which all persons, both living and dead, will stand before God to be “judged according to their works.” John wrote, “And anyone whose name was not found written in the book of life was thrown into the lake of fire.” The “book of life” lists all those who have believed and obeyed Jesus Christ.
Jesus himself said, “I will freely give to the thirsty from the spring of the water of life . . . But the . . . [unbelievers] . . . their share will be in the lake that burns with fire and sulfur, which is the second death” (Rv 21:6-8). This passage reveals central truths concerning who will be saved. Redemption comes by grace through faith in Christ, apart from individual merit. Those who have not believed are deemed “unbelievers” and will receive a just and endless punishment in hell.
During his earthly ministry, Jesus talked more often about final judgment than he did about heaven (see Mt 25:41; Lk 16:23-31). He also warned anyone who rejected him, “Therefore, just as the weeds are gathered and burned in the fire, so it will be at the end of the age” (Mt 13:40). Throughout the New Testament, the apostles consistently echoed their Lord’s theme (see 2Th 1:5-9; Heb 9:27; 2Pt 3:7).
Despite repeated scriptural emphasis to the contrary, universalists commonly raise three objections to the exclusivity of the gospel.
All religions are equally true; therefore everyone will be saved. This claim is easily disproved. For example, a Hindu might say all religions lead to God, while a Christian asserts that Jesus is the only way to the Father. In order to stay true to his conviction, the Hindu must say that the Christian’s exclusive claim is wrong. But once he has said this, he has violated his dictum that all religions are equally valid. The two beliefs cannot both be right. Therefore it cannot be concluded on this basis that all persons will be saved.
God will give all human beings an opportunity to accept the gospel after death. Despite a lack of biblical evidence in its favor, this view teaches that God will offer a final chance for people to repent after death and before the judgment. On the contrary, the Scriptures clearly indicate that once a man dies, it is too late for him to repent and turn to God (see Mt 25:35-46; Lk 16:19-31). “And just as it is appointed for people to die once—and after this, judgment” (Heb 9:27).
What about the “man on the island” who has never heard the gospel? It would not be fair for God to send such a person to hell for not believing in Jesus. This argument from emotion is often heard and particularly dangerous. If it is true that God is obligated to save everyone who has not heard the gospel, then we might be better advised to recall all missionaries and stop proclaiming the gospel. Of course, the Bible does not allow such a God-dishonoring approach. The “man on the island,” like all people, is in desperate need of the good news about the forgiveness of sins through Jesus Christ.
TWISTED SCRIPTURE | Malachi 3:1 |
Jehovah’s Witnesses use this verse to underscore their belief that, in 1918, Jesus returned to cleanse the temple and he did so spiritually by releasing people from their bondage to “Babylon the Great” (false religion), finishing his work by the year 1919. This verse does not teach the return of Christ in 1918 to release persons from the bondage of false religion. The verse does concern false religion, but it concerns God’s judgment on that false religion and his desire for his people to return back to him.