Mark 9 Study Notes

PLUS

This resource is exclusive for PLUS Members

Upgrade now and receive:

  • Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy uninterrupted access.
  • Exclusive Commentaries: Dive deeper with in-depth insights.
  • Advanced Study Tools: Powerful search and comparison features.
  • Premium Guides & Articles: Unlock for a more comprehensive study.
Upgrade to Plus

9:22 To destroy him shows the evil intention of demons. The father asked for help based on Jesus’s compassion (see notes at 1:40-45 and 6:33-34). If you can was an appropriate qualifier, considering the disciples’ failure to cast out the demon.

9:23 At issue was not Jesus’s ability but the father’s faith—everything is possible for the one who believes (cp. 5:36; 10:27).

9:24 Both faith and unbelief resided in the father’s heart. Mark previously used unbelief when describing the people of Nazareth (see note at 6:5-6a).

9:25 The demonic spirit was mute and deaf, rendering the boy mute (v. 17). When Jesus issued the command to come out of him, he used a word that emphasized his authority. The demon was able to resist the disciples, but not the Lord. Jesus’s command to never enter him again is unique in all the exorcisms in the Gospels.

9:26-27 The unclean spirit responded like one that Jesus had cast out earlier (see note at 1:25-26).

9:28-29 To the disciples’ question why, Jesus told them this kind (apparently a very resistant and powerful evil being) required spiritual preparation on the part of the exorcist, specifically prayer.

9:30 This is the last reference in Mark to Galilee within a context prior to Jesus’s resurrection (see 14:28 and 16:7).

9:31 Jesus’s second death prediction is the briefest of the three (see notes at 8:31; 10:33-34), and has much in common with the others. The new element in this prediction is that he would be betrayed.

9:32 Luke explains why the disciples did not understand: “It was concealed from them so that they could not grasp it” (Lk 9:45).

9:33 This is the last time Jesus returned to Capernaum. The house may have been Peter’s (see note at 1:29-31).

9:34 They were silent also described the people in the Capernaum synagogue (3:4).

9:35 Sitting down was the posture assumed by a teacher (4:1-2; Mt 5:1). Jesus’s teaching reversed human thinking. In his value system, being first did not come through aggressiveness and privilege but through humility (Mt 18:4) and by being servant of all.

9:36-37 Jesus used a child as an object lesson. He did not command his disciples to become like children but to welcome those who are like a little child. A child is an example of a person with no status and no rights.

9:38 It is ironic that the disciples told this man to stop driving out demons when they had failed at the same task (vv. 14-29). Apparently they thought they were the only ones authorized to do this (3:14-15; 6:7,13). The episode recalls Nm 11:26-29.

9:39-41 Jesus gave three reasons not to stop the man. First, anyone who performed a miracle in Jesus’s name wouldn’t turn and speak evil of him. Second, there is no middle ground. A person is either against or for Jesus. Third, anyone who extends a kind gesture (giving a cup of water was a basic Eastern courtesy) in my name . . . will never lose his reward.

9:42 To cause someone to fall away refers to hindering discipleship or causing someone to sin. Little ones refers to immature disciples. A heavy millstone was the one donkeys turned to grind wheat. As terrible as drowning was, Jesus said it would be better than suffering the punishments of vv. 43-48.

9:43-48 The body parts and admonitions are figures of speech that warn disciples to guard their sight and actions against participation in evil, for recklessness here can lead to spiritual downfall (cp. Jb 31:1,5,7). This is the only place where Mark used the word for hell (Gk gehenna). The imagery for hell developed from the Hinnom Valley southwest of Jerusalem. This valley was used for pagan human sacrifice (2Kg 16:3; 21:6; Jr 7:31), hence the association with unquenchable fire and perpetual rot (their worm does not die).

9:49-50 Jesus’s puzzling statement in v. 49 probably drew on the association of fire and salt in the sacrificial context of Lv 2:13. The first salt saying of Mk 9:50 occurs elsewhere (Mt 5:13; Lk 14:34) and focuses on the good uses of salt, which disciples must reflect on (Mt 5:13). Salt from deposits around the Dead Sea could lose its flavor since it was not pure sodium chloride. Disciples who lose their saltiness are no longer effective witnesses. The second “salt saying” of v. 50 draws on the OT custom of using salt in making covenants of peace (Lv 2:13; Nm 18:19; 2Ch 13:5; cp. Col 4:6).