11.3.1. Internal Evidence for an Early Date
Share
This resource is exclusive for PLUS Members
Upgrade now and receive:
- Ad-Free Experience: Enjoy uninterrupted access.
- Exclusive Commentaries: Dive deeper with in-depth insights.
- Advanced Study Tools: Powerful search and comparison features.
- Premium Guides & Articles: Unlock for a more comprehensive study.
1 David Chilton, The Days of Vengeance (Tyler, TX: Dominion Press, 1987), 5.
2 The text that Jesus cited concerning the Temples desecration, Dan. Dan. 9:27, predicts that the one who desecrates this Temple will himself be destroyed. By contrast, those who destroyed the temple in A.D. 70 (in fulfillment of Jesus prediction)the Roman emperor Vespasian and his son Tituswere not destroyed but returned to Rome in triumph carrying vessels from the destroyed Temple.Thomas Ice, The Great Tribulation is Future, in Kenneth L. Gentry and Thomas Ice, The Great Tribulation: Past or Future? (Grand Rapids, MI: Kregel Publications, 1999), 126. Mat. 24:16-20 is difficult if not impossible to explain. By then it would be too late for the followers of the Lord Jesus to escape; the Romans had already taken the city by this time. D.A. Carson notes, by the time the Romans had actually desecrated the temple in A.D. 70, it was too late for anyone in the city to flee. Ibid., 138.
3 Alfred Edersheim, The Temple: Its Ministry and Services (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson Publishers, 1994), s.v. ch. 7.
4 The name which fits the circumstances most admirably is that of the nefarious Nero Caesar.Kenneth L. Gentry, Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation (Atlanta, GA: American Vision, 1998), 198.
5 Ibid., 168.
6 What is perhaps more significant than Johns mention of a Temple is the lack of explicit mention of the destruction of Jerusalem in A.D. 70. Although this may seem unusual, neither is it conclusive evidence of an early date. The destruction of Jerusalem would have been widely known to readers of his day obviating any need to discuss it. Moreover, the major focus of the book involves events of global magnitude preceding the Second Coming of Christevents which are at least 1900 years beyond the Roman destruction of Jerusalem.
7 Gentry, Before Jerusalem Fell: Dating the Book of Revelation, 173.
8 The twenty-fifth year of the captivity, and the fourteenth year after the city was smitten, i.e., taken and reduced to ashes, are the year 575 before Christ.Carl Friedrich Keil and Franz Delitzsch, Commentary on the Old Testament (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2002), Eze. 40:1.
9 Mark Hitchcock, The Stake in the HeartThe A.D. 95 Date of Revelation, in Tim LaHaye and Thomas Ice, eds., The End Times Controversy (Eugene, OR: Harvest House Publishers, 2003), 140.
10 When [Zec. Zec. 1:16] was written, the Second Temple was still standing so the reference can only be to the rebuilding of the Temple the Romans destroyed in 70 AD. Israel Today Magazine, April 2001, 22.