John 18

PLUS

18:1 When Jesus had spoken these words¹, he went forth with his disciples over the brook Kidron, where was a garden, into which he entered, himself and his disciples.

Matthew 26:30

When Jesus had spoken these words. The words contained in John chapters 14-17.

18:2 Now Judas also, who betrayed him, knew the place¹: for Jesus oft-times resorted thither with his disciples.

Now Judas also, who betrayed him, knew the place. See Luke 21:37 ; Luke 22:39 .

18:3 Judas then, having received the band [of soldiers], and officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees¹, cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons².

Judas then, having received the band [of soldiers], and officers from the chief priests and the Pharisees. See Mark 14:43.
Cometh thither with lanterns and torches and weapons. They were well supplied with lights, for while the Passover is always held whenthe moon is full, the moon at this time of night would be near setting,and the valley of the Kidron, in which Gethsemane lay, would bedarkened by the shadow of the adjoining mountain.

18:4 Jesus therefore, knowing all the things that were coming upon him¹, went forth, and saith unto them, Whom seek ye²?

Jesus therefore, knowing all the things that were coming upon him,
went forth. John mentions the foreknowledge of Jesus to remind us that he could have avoided the arrest had he chosen to do so. Even theforeknowledge of Elisha was difficult to deal with ( 2 Kings 6:8-12 ).
And saith unto them, Whom seek ye? Jesus asked this question: (1) to openly and manfully declare his identity; (2) to make the Jewishrulers fully conscious that they were arresting him, an innocent man;(3) to confine the arrest to himself and thus deliver his disciples.

18:6 When therefore he said unto them, I am [he], they went backward, and fell to the ground¹.

They went backward, and fell to the ground. The older commentators regard the falling to the ground as a miracle, but modern scholars lookupon it as a result of sudden fear. Jesus merely manifested his dignityand majesty, and the prostration followed as a natural result.

18:9 that the word might be fulfilled which he spake, Of those whom thou hast given me I lost not one¹.

That the word might be fulfilled which he spake, Of those whom thou hast given me I lost not one. See John 17:12 .

18:10 Simon Peter therefore having a sword drew it, and struck the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear¹. Now the servant's name was Malchus².

Simon Peter therefore having a sword drew it, and struck the high priest's servant, and cut off his right ear. See Mark 14:47.
Now the servant's name was Malchus. John knew the household of the high priest ( John 18:16 ). He knew Malchus by name, and he also knew hiskindred ( John 18:26 ).

18:11 Jesus therefore said unto Peter, Put up the sword into the sheath: the cup which the Father hath given me, shall I not drink it¹?

The cup which the Father hath given me, shall I not drink it? By using the word "cup" John gives us an echo of the agony in Gethsemane,which suggests that he expects his readers to be conversant with theother Gospels. See Matthew 26:39 ; Mark 14:36 ; Luke 22:42 . The other Evangelists,having shown that Jesus was fully resolved to drink the cup, do notregard it necessary to repeat these words.

18:12 So the band and the chief captain, and the officers of the Jews, seized Jesus and bound him,

John 18:12-14

John 18:19-23

18:13 and led him to Annas first; for he was father in law to Caiaphas¹, who was high priest that year.

And led him to Annas first; for he was father in law to Caiaphas,
who was high priest that year. For confusion in the priesthood, see Luke 3:2 andsee John 11:49.

18:14 Now Caiaphas was he that gave counsel to the Jews, that it was expedient that one man should die for the people¹.

Now Caiaphas was he that gave counsel to the Jews, that it was expedient that one man should die for the people.See John 11:49. John restates this fact to remind the readerthat Jesus was about to be tried by those who had prejudged him anddecided upon his death.

18:15 And Simon Peter followed Jesus, and [so did] another disciple². Now that disciple was known unto the high priest³, and entered in with Jesus into the court of the high priest;

Now Simon Peter followed Jesus. See Mark 14:54.
And [so did] another disciple. Evidently the apostle John, who thus speaks of himself impersonally.
Now that disciple was known unto the high priest. John's acquaintanceship appears to have been with the household as well aswith the high priest personally, for we find that it is used as apermit at the doorway. It is likely that the high priest knew Johnrather in a business way ( Acts 4:13 ).

18:16 but Peter was standing at the door without. So the other disciple, who was known unto the high priest, went out and spake unto her that kept the door¹, and brought in Peter².

And spake unto her that kept the door. It is still customary to have female porters at the houses of the great and rich. See Acts 12:13 .
And brought in Peter. John would have shown a truer kindness to Peter had he let him stay out.

18:17 The maid therefore that kept the door saith unto Peter, Art thou also [one] of this man's disciples? He saith, I am not².

Art not thou also [one] of this man's disciples? The doorkeeper evidently recognized John as a disciple, and was therefore suspiciousof Peter.
He saith, I am not. The cowardly "I am not" of Peter is a sad contrast to the strong "I am" of Jesus ( John 18:8 ).

18:18 Now the servants and the officers were standing [there], having made a fire of coals; for it was cold; and they were warming themselves: and Peter also was with them, standing and warming himself¹.

And Peter also was with them, standing and warming himself. See Mark 14:54.

18:19 The high priest¹ therefore asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his teaching².

The high priest. We should note that John calls Annas high priest. The high priesthood was a life office. According to Moses, Annas washigh priest, but the Romans had given the office to Caiaphas, so thatAnnas was high priest de jure, but Caiaphas was so de facto. As highpriest, therefore, and as head of the Sadducean party, the peoplelooked to Annas before Caiaphas, taking Jesus to him first. Theinfluence of Annas is shown by the fact that he made five of his sonsand sons-in-law high priests. Annas is said to have been about sixtyyears old at this time.
Therefore asked Jesus of his disciples, and of his teaching. Annas questioned Jesus for the purpose of obtaining, if possible, somematerial out of which to frame an actual accusation.

18:20 Jesus answered him, I have spoken openly to the world; I ever taught in synagogues¹, and in the temple, where all the Jews come together; and in secret spake I nothing².

I ever taught in synagogues. See Mark 1:39.
And in secret spake I nothing. Jesus indeed spoke some things privately ( Matthew 13:10 Matthew 13:11 ), but he did not do so for the purposes ofconcealment ( Matthew 10:27 ). Jesus was the light of the world; addressinghis teachings to all flesh, he chose the most public places to utterthem--places, however, dedicated to the worship of the true God.

18:21 Why askest thou me¹? Ask them that have heard [me], what I spake unto them²: behold, these know the things which I said³.

Why askest thou me? He who had said that heaven and earth would pass away, but that his word would not pass away ( Luke 21:33 ), didnot suffer his teaching to be held in contempt; he did not permit it tobe made matter for cross examination.
Ask them that have heard [me], what I spake unto them. On the contrary, it was to be taken cognizance of among the things universallyknown and understood.
Behold, these know the things which I said. The very officers who had arrested him could tell about it ( John 7:45 John 7:46 ).

18:23 Jesus answered him, If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil¹: but if well, why smitest thou me²?

If I have spoken evil, bear witness of the evil. Jesus was then under arrest, and as the trial had not yet opened there was ample timeto add new matter to the charges against him. If, in addressing thehigh priest, he had just spoken words worthy of punishment, the officerwho struck him should, instead, have preferred charges against him in alegal manner.
But if well, why smitest thou me? If the officer could not do this (and the point is that he could not), he was doubly wrong in strikinghim. Thus the Lord calmly rebuked the wrong-doer. Compare his conductwith that of Paul under somewhat similar circumstances ( Acts 23:1-3 ).Jesus exemplified his teaching at Matthew 5:39 . Says Luther,
"Christ forbids self-defense with the hand, not with the tongue."

18:24 Annas therefore sent him bound unto Caiaphas the high priest¹.

Annas therefore sent him bound unto Caiaphas the high priest. Foiled in his attempted examination of Jesus, Annas sends him to trial.

18:28 They lead Jesus therefore from Caiaphas into the Praetorium¹: and it was early; and they themselves entered not into the Praetorium, that they might not be defiled, but might eat the passover².

They lead Jesus therefore from Caiaphas into the Praetorium. See Mark 15:1.
FIRST STAGE OF THE ROMAN TRIAL. JESUS BEFORE PILATE FOR THE FIRST TIME. (Jerusalem. Early Friday morning.) Matthew 27:11-14 ; Mark 15:2-5 ; Luke 23:2-5 ; John 18:28-38
And they themselves entered not into the Praetorium, that they might not be defiled, but might eat the passover. See Mark 14:1.

18:30 They answered and said unto him, If this man were not an evildoer, we should not have delivered him up unto thee¹.

If this man were not an evildoer, we should not have delivered him up unto thee. The Jewish rulers first attempt to induce Pilate toaccept their verdict and condemn Jesus upon it, and execute him withouta trial. If they had succeeded in this, Jesus would have been put todeath as a blasphemer. But as Pilate had insisted upon trying Jesus,and as blasphemy was not a capital offense under the Roman law, Jesuswas condemned and executed as the King of the Jews.

18:31 Pilate therefore said unto them, Take him yourselves, and judge him according to your law¹. The Jews said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death²:

Pilate therefore said unto them, Take him yourselves, and judge him according to your law. As the Jews insisted on their own verdict,Pilate bade them pronounce their own sentence, declining to mixjurisdictions by pronouncing a Roman sentence on a Sanhedrin verdict.
The Jews said unto him, It is not lawful for us to put any man to death. The Jews responded that it is not in their power to pronouncethe sentence for which their verdict called, since they could not putto death. Jesus could only be sentenced to death by the Roman court,and crucifixion was the mode by which its death sentence was executed.

18:32 that the word of Jesus might be fulfilled, which he spake¹, signifying by what manner of death he should die.

That the word of Jesus might be fulfilled, which he spake,
signifying by what manner of death he should die. Jesus had predicted all this in the simple statement in the simple statement that he shoulddie by crucifixion ( John 12:33 John 12:34 ), but he also gave the details of histrial ( Matthew 20:18 Matthew 20:19 ; Mark 10:33 Mark 10:34 ).

18:33 Pilate therefore entered again into the Praetorium, and called Jesus¹, and said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews²?

Pilate therefore entered again into the Praetorium, and called Jesus. See Matthew 27:11.
And said unto him, Art thou the King of the Jews? See Mark 15:2.

18:34 Jesus answered, Sayest thou this of thyself, or did others tell it thee concerning me¹?

Sayest thou this of thyself, or did others tell it thee concerning me? Jesus asks a question which forms the strongest negation that heis a king in the sense contained in the Jewish accusation. Had he beena king in that sense, Pilate would have been the one most likely toknow it. The question also, by an indirect query as to the accuser,reveals to Pilate's mind that no Roman had accused him. He was accusedof the Jews, and when he had that restless, rebellious people everfound fault with a man who sought to free them from the galling Romanyoke?

18:35 Pilate answered, Am I a Jew¹? Thine own nation and the chief priests delivered thee unto me²: what hast thou done³?

Am I a Jew? The strong, practical mind of the Roman at once caught the drift of Christ's question, and perceived that the title "King ofthe Jews" had in it a double meaning, so that it might be construed insome unpolitical sense. What this sense was he could not tell, for hewas not a Jews. The mysteries of that nation were of no interest tohim, save where his office compelled him to understand them.
Thine own nation and the chief priests delivered thee unto me. Pilate concedes that the accusation against Jesus comes from anunexpected and suspicious source.
What hast thou done? Pilate asks Jesus to tell him plainly by what means he had incurred the enmity of the leaders of his people.

18:36 Jesus answered, My kingdom is not of this world¹: if my kingdom were of this world, then would my servants fight, that I should not be delivered to the Jews: but now is my kingdom not from hence.

My kingdom is not of this world. Jesus answers Pilate's question indirectly. He had done something to incur the enmity of the rulers,and that was to have authority with and exercise influence over thepeople ( John 12:19 ). They objected to his kingly claims( Matthew 21:15 Matthew 21:16 ; Luke 19:38 Luke 19:39 ), but Jesus shows Pilate that these kinglyclaims, however distasteful to the Jews, were no offense or menaceagainst the authority of Rome. Further than this, Jesus did not definehis kingdom for Pilate had no concern in it beyond this. It wassufficient to inform him that it made no use of physical power even forpurposes of defense. Such a kingdom could cause no trouble to Rome, andthe bare fact stated by Jesus proved that it was indeed such a kingdom.

18:37 Pilate therefore said unto him, Art thou a king then? Jesus answered, Thou sayest that I am a king¹. To this end have I been born, and to this end am I come into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth². Every one that is of the truth heareth my voice.

Thou sayest that I am a king. See Mark 14:62.
To this end have I been born, and to this end am I come into the world, that I should bear witness unto the truth. Jesus hereenlightens Pilate as to the nature of his kingdom. He, the King, wasthe incarnation of truth, and all those who derive the inspiration oftheir life from truth were his subjects. For the purpose of thusbearing witness to and revealing truth Jesus had been born, thusentering a new state of being, and he had come into the world in thischanged condition, thus entering a new sphere of action. The wordsclearly imply the pre-existence of Christ and no doubt aroused thatstate of uneasiness or fear which was increased by the words of theJewish rulers ( John 19:7 John 19:8 ).

18:38 Pilate saith unto him, What is truth¹? And when he had said this, he went out again unto the Jews, and saith unto them, I find no crime in him².

What is truth? This question has been regarded as an earnest inquiry (Chrysostom), the inquiry of one who despaired (Olshausen), a scoffingquestion (Alford), etc. But is evident that Pilate asked it intendingto investigate the case of Jesus further, but, suddenly concluding thathe already knew enough to answer his purpose as a judge, he stifles hiscuriosity as a human being and proceeds with the trial of Jesus,leaving the question unanswered.
I find no crime in him. See Luke 23:4.

18:39 But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover¹: will ye therefore that I release unto you the King of the Jews?

But ye have a custom, that I should release unto you one at the passover. See Mark 15:8.

PREVIOUS John 17 NEXT John 19

John 18

Share