Chapter 22
Share
THE GREAT SCHISM (AD 1378-1410)
CHAPTER XXII: THE GREAT SCHISM (AD 1378-1410)
Gregory XI died in 1378, and the choice of a successor to him was no
easy matter. The Romans were bent on having a countryman of their
own, that they might be sure of his continuing to live among them.
They guarded the gates, they brought into the city a number of rough
and half-savage people from the hills around, to terrify the
cardinals; and, when these were shut up for the election, the mob
surrounded the palace in which they were with cries of "We will have
a Roman, or at least an Italian!" Day and night their shouts were
kept up, with a frightful din of other kinds. They broke into the
pope's cellars, got drunk on the wine, and were thus made more
furious than before. At length, the cardinals, driven to extreme
terror, made choice of Bartholomew Prignano, archbishop of Bari, in
south Italy, who was not one of their own number. It is certain that
he was not chosen freely, but under fear of the noise and threats of
the Roman mob; but all the forms which follow after the election of
a pope, such as that of coronation, were regularly gone through, and
the cardinals seem to have given their approval of the choice in
such a way that they could not well draw back afterwards.
But Urban VI (as the new pope called himself), although he had until
then been much esteemed as a pious and modest man, seems to have
lost his head on being raised to his new office. He held himself
vastly above the cardinals, wishing to reform them violently, and to
lord it over them in a style which they had not been used to. By
such conduct he provoked them to oppose him. They objected that he
had not been freely chosen, and also that he was not in his right
mind; and a party of them met at Fondi and chose another pope,
Clement VII, a Frenchman, who settled at Avignon.
Thus began what is called the Great Schism of the West. There were
now two rival popes--one of them having his court at Rome, and the
other at Avignon; and the kingdoms of Europe were divided between
the two. The cost of keeping up two courts weighed heavily on the
Christians of the West; and all sorts of tricks were used to squeeze
out fees and money on all possible occasions. As an instance of
this, I may mention that Boniface IX, one of the Roman line of
popes, celebrated two jubilees with only ten years between them,
although in Boniface VIII's time it had been supposed that the
jubilee was to come only once in a hundred years.
The princes of Europe were scandalized by this division and often
tried to heal it, but in vain; for the popes, although they
professed to desire such a thing, were generally far from hearty in
saying so. At length it seemed as If the breach were to be healed by
a council held at Pisa in 1409, which set aside both the rivals, and
elected a new pope, Alexander V. But it was found that the two old
claimants would not give way; and thus the council of Pisa, in
trying to cure the evil of having two popes, had saddled the Church
with a third.
Alexander did not hold the papacy quite eleven months (June 1409 to
May 1410). He had fallen wholly under the power of a cardinal named
Balthasar Cossa; and this cardinal was chosen to succeed him, under
the name of John XXIII. John was one of the worst men who ever held
the papacy. It is said that he had been a pirate, and that from this
he had got the habit of waking all night and sleeping by day. He
had been governor of Bologna, where he had indulged himself to the
full in cruelty, greed, and other vices. He was even suspected of
having poisoned Alexander; and, although he must no doubt have been
a very clever man, it is not easy to understand how the other
cardinals can have chosen one who was so notoriously wicked to the
papacy.
Gregory XI died in 1378, and the choice of a successor to him was no
easy matter. The Romans were bent on having a countryman of their
own, that they might be sure of his continuing to live among them.
They guarded the gates, they brought into the city a number of rough
and half-savage people from the hills around, to terrify the
cardinals; and, when these were shut up for the election, the mob
surrounded the palace in which they were with cries of "We will have
a Roman, or at least an Italian!" Day and night their shouts were
kept up, with a frightful din of other kinds. They broke into the
pope's cellars, got drunk on the wine, and were thus made more
furious than before. At length, the cardinals, driven to extreme
terror, made choice of Bartholomew Prignano, archbishop of Bari, in
south Italy, who was not one of their own number. It is certain that
he was not chosen freely, but under fear of the noise and threats of
the Roman mob; but all the forms which follow after the election of
a pope, such as that of coronation, were regularly gone through, and
the cardinals seem to have given their approval of the choice in
such a way that they could not well draw back afterwards.
But Urban VI (as the new pope called himself), although he had until
then been much esteemed as a pious and modest man, seems to have
lost his head on being raised to his new office. He held himself
vastly above the cardinals, wishing to reform them violently, and to
lord it over them in a style which they had not been used to. By
such conduct he provoked them to oppose him. They objected that he
had not been freely chosen, and also that he was not in his right
mind; and a party of them met at Fondi and chose another pope,
Clement VII, a Frenchman, who settled at Avignon.
Thus began what is called the Great Schism of the West. There were
now two rival popes--one of them having his court at Rome, and the
other at Avignon; and the kingdoms of Europe were divided between
the two. The cost of keeping up two courts weighed heavily on the
Christians of the West; and all sorts of tricks were used to squeeze
out fees and money on all possible occasions. As an instance of
this, I may mention that Boniface IX, one of the Roman line of
popes, celebrated two jubilees with only ten years between them,
although in Boniface VIII's time it had been supposed that the
jubilee was to come only once in a hundred years.
The princes of Europe were scandalized by this division and often
tried to heal it, but in vain; for the popes, although they
professed to desire such a thing, were generally far from hearty in
saying so. At length it seemed as If the breach were to be healed by
a council held at Pisa in 1409, which set aside both the rivals, and
elected a new pope, Alexander V. But it was found that the two old
claimants would not give way; and thus the council of Pisa, in
trying to cure the evil of having two popes, had saddled the Church
with a third.
Alexander did not hold the papacy quite eleven months (June 1409 to
May 1410). He had fallen wholly under the power of a cardinal named
Balthasar Cossa; and this cardinal was chosen to succeed him, under
the name of John XXIII. John was one of the worst men who ever held
the papacy. It is said that he had been a pirate, and that from this
he had got the habit of waking all night and sleeping by day. He
had been governor of Bologna, where he had indulged himself to the
full in cruelty, greed, and other vices. He was even suspected of
having poisoned Alexander; and, although he must no doubt have been
a very clever man, it is not easy to understand how the other
cardinals can have chosen one who was so notoriously wicked to the
papacy.